REACTION We say YES to the CSDDD. Joint Civil Society Statement reacting to lack of majority in COREPER
February 28th, 2024
by ECCJ Team

Today, EU Member States have sent a clear message: no change is needed in business conduct – despite the years-long debates and negotiations between the co-legislators and the stark defy the resounding support for the Directive from governments, trade unions, civil society, large, medium and small businesses, and individual citizens.

This afternoon, EU diplomats met at the Coreper to decide and endorse the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).

As a reaction, over 140 European organisations share the same disappointment and call on the Belgian Presidency to rise to the occasion, circle back to the Member States and ensure a strong majority without haggling over the key principles of the compromise hammered out in the trialogue agreement.

Joint Civil Society Statement: We say YES to the CSDDD

Today’s failure of the EU Council to endorse the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive marks a deplorable setback for corporate accountability and the protection of Human Rights and the environment worldwide.

The blockage is largely attributable to big Member States: the early announced abstention from influential Germany – orchestrated by the minority German coalition partner, the FDP, and met with spiritless resistance by Chancellor Scholz – was followed by others. A last-minute attempt by France to derail negotiations by proposing a tenfold increase in company threshold last night increased the uncertainty for other states. These political games starkly defy the resounding support for the Directive from governments, trade unions, civil society, large, medium and small businesses, and individual citizens. Without binding EU legislation on corporate accountability, national governments fail to address human rights impacts, the exploitation of workers, and impacts on Indigenous Peoples’s rights and other traditional communities and natural ecosystems linked to corporate operations. It is a harrowing failure by EU governments to meet their obligations under international human rights law, and a green-light signal to reckless businesses that they can keep fueling the climate and ecological crises for corporate profits.

This lack of support threatens a vital piece of EU sustainability legislation, necessary and overdue to trigger the change in business conduct. It is the result of a democratic process in the European Parliament and of extensive negotiations with Member States. Now more than ever, the Belgian Presidency must rise to the occasion: it is time to circle back to the Member States and ensure a strong majority without haggling over the key principles of the compromise hammered out in the trilogue agreement.

It is utterly deplorable that EU capitals have turned their backs on the political agreement reached in December. We implore Member States to return to the negotiation table with a renewed sense of urgency. Protecting human rights and the environment is not a poker game. Failure to adopt the CSDDD would be a slap in the face to those people whose lives and livelihoods are being harmed by business operations. Power struggles and indifference must not dictate our future.
Nele Meyer - ECCJ Director